Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Viral Catalysts, Passive Discoverability, Nothing But a Crock of Shit.

"I don't like that guy, Davey. He's not telling us what we want to hear."












Louis Shalako





When Smashwords founder Mark Coker stands up in front of yet another convention packed with wannabes and speaks about viral catalysts, what is he really talking about?

What does he want?

What is he telling you to do?

What he wants is for you to spend $500.00 on a book cover. What he wants is for you to spend $2000.00 on a ‘professional’ editor. What he wants is for you to spend $425.00 on a Kirkus five-star review. What he wants is for you to do the million-blog tour.

He wants to see enthusiasm. The more mindless that enthusiasm, the better.

Enthusiasm is the opposite of critical thinking.

He wants you to put everything you got into it. The odds of you becoming a bestseller are miniscule. 

Your costs are not his costs—but he gets a dime for every book you sell through his platform.

He cheerfully admits that Smashwords and other digital, do-it-yourself vanity publishing platforms have enabled millions of ‘horrible’ books to enter the marketplace. And that’s okay with him.

I don’t even really care either. Your books aren’t going anywhere. You’re the only one that doesn’t see it.

While ninety-nine percent of book buyers might go away satisfied with their purchase, it’s pretty obvious ninety-nine-point-nine-nine-nine percent of Smashwords authors will eventually go away disappointed too, and I reckon they’ll be walking a bit funny when they do.

It’s a very exploitive business model, and it’s not too hard to predict that at some point in the future, there will be a reaction. There’s going to be some pushback.

This is just the thin end of the wedge.

All the optimism, all the talk of ‘control’ in digital publishing is a crock of shit.

In a previous blog post, I noted that all of my titles appeared on txtr, while there were quite a few missing on OverDrive. I contacted SW staff. Marcus V reshipped all of those titles and they appeared back on the OverDrive website. A mere matter of weeks later, I could not help but note that two-thirds of my titles were unaccountably missing from txtr.

How in the hell did that happen, Mister Coker? When SW staff asked me to provide links to the missing titles I asked them how often I could reasonably be expected to do that. The lady refused to answer the question. I’ll be damned if I can go back once a week to every stinking distribution channel, check to see what books have mysteriously gone missing, and spend a half hour for each pen-name, each platform, and provide SW with those links on the off chance that the titles won’t just disappear again within a week.

What that means is that we are now on our own.

What is professional editing?

Professional editing is when you pay someone two bucks a page and they go through your book, mark it up with red ink and send it back to you. The most substantive editing is content editing. This is also the most expensive editing.

I’m not denying that most writers need and use editors.

Unfortunately my skills are such that finding an editor that is actually better than me is virtually impossible. After twenty years on an Ontario Disability Support Program pension, there is just no way that I can afford thirty-five bucks, or fifty bucks, or a hundred bucks for a book cover. I have a hundred and fourteen titles and five pen names.

I don't have any money.

Mr. Coker is essentially telling me that I write too fast. He’s telling me to slow down. He’s saying he’s not going to make any money off me if I don’t sink more money, a lot more money, into the product displayed in his store.

At fifty bucks a cover, that would be $5,700.00 in covers alone.

It took five years to make my first thousand dollars from this industry. With a bit of luck, the way things are going, I will be very fortunate to make $1,000.00 this year. It is true the bulk of that will come from Smashwords, as passive discoverability, (remember all those viral catalysts?) absolutely does not work on certain other platforms. This is especially true of Amazon, who play all kinds of dirty little tricks to get exclusivity, who are constantly price-matching, and quite frankly Amazon is the biggest crock of shit in this entire marketplace.

At least they have the grace to keep their mouth shut.

There are an estimated thirty million books listed on Amazon, the vast bulk of them either unremarkable or downright horrible. No matter how good (or bad) a book might be, it’s not going to be passively discovered there and everybody knows it.

Everybody knows it and that’s why they sign up for Kindle Select, that’s why they blog and spam, that’s why they pay for reviews and that’s why they’re always clubbing together and giving each other as many five-star reviews as they can generate. That’s why they load up the front of their books with crock of shit blurbs, written by crock of shit folks who haven’t even read the crock of shit book…fifty five star reviews written by their friends and relatives before the book ever comes out. 

They make a science of lying to and misleading prospective readers.

There is nothing fair or even reasonable about this industry. Bad books end up on the New York Times list all the time. I’ve read many of them.

The editing for content is shit in some of those books. I’m talking authors like Robert Ludlum, Jack Higgins and Clive Cussler. Some of that editing for content is shockingly bad, and in the case of Cussler, the dialogue stinks much of the time. If Dirk Pitt ties a rope on his ass and plunges into one more God-damned underground river while Al Giordino stands there with a thumb up his ass telling all who will listen that Dirk is the bravest and luckiest and smartest and sexiest man alive, I think I am going to puke.

My books meet or exceed all industry standards in terms of editing and proofreading. One of the reasons for that is because this industry is a cash cow that has never been seriously challenged in the past. It’s also not very good sometimes.

The other thing is that I have the skill, a skill acquired over thirty-one years, and I take the time. This is no guarantee of success, in fact the opposite seems to be true.

I am quite frankly shocked by the number of people who can’t spell, can’t write, or simply can’t be bothered to turn on grammar check. They spend four or five grand on some shit book that is supposed to make them some money. They set the price at $0.99 on Amazon, where it is going to take a hell of a long time, at a royalty of $0.35 per copy, to cover your costs. They still think they have a right to succeed as authors. Why, just look at all the money those bourgeois crocks of shit have spent on their books. For every thousand you spend on your book, you will have to sell two thousand eight hundred and fifty-seven copies just to make the costs back. How many people on Amazon or any other platform do you think sell anywhere near three thousand books? How long do you think it takes for them to do that?

They wouldn’t do that if they didn’t have certain expectations—expectations that they feel are reasonable. If that isn’t a sense of entitlement, I would sure like to know what is. The fact that you spent money on it doesn’t make it a good book, and it doesn’t make you a good writer. It is pure vanity much of the time.

The sooner you get out of the business, the better it will be for you, and quite frankly, the better it will be for readers, and the rest of us who genuinely must be writers, which, under some circumstances, is a fate worse than death.

Trust me on that one.

I'm in a position to know, which is more than can be said for the professional cheerleaders.

END

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Researching a Historical Novel.

Justus Juncker, A Scholar Sitting at His Desk.












Louis Shalako


The thing about research is that 99.99 % of it never ends up in the book. You do have to know your ground.

It's not even necessary to be an expert on any given period of history.

However, for a historical novel set in France in 1924, it must be anchored in time and place. The Olympics were held in France in 1924, the Tour de France would be happening,
everyone would have heard of the Flying Finn, and France had a new President.

There were certain political attitudes, the arts were at a certain stage, and technology and culture had reached a certain stage of development.

Some of the links are simple, finding fresh names, checking geography and transportation, maps, places, terrain.

Every so often I want to check my understanding of a word--'pension,' for example, which was from something I had read years or decades ago.

Here are some but by no means all of the resources used in the making of Architect of His Own Destruction, the fourth in the Maintenon Mystery Series.



Events in 1924


Summer Olympics


Paavo Nurmi


World Events


World Events History Orb


World Events


Boy names


Girl Names


Surnames


%C3%A9mery#mw-pages

Bagneres de Luchon (Haute Garonne)


French Rail System (2014)


Haute Couture


Evening Dresses

Gare de Bagneres de Luchon




President of France June 13, 1924


Radical-Socialists



Chiappe


France in the 1920s


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interwar_Period 

Radical Party

"In 1924, Radicals formed electoral alliances with the SFIO: the Cartel des Gauches (Coalition of the Left). It won the 1924 legislative election and Édouard Herriot took the head of the cabinet. But then Radicals gradually drifted to the right, moving from Radical governments supported by the non-participating Socialists to a coalition of "Republican concentration" with more conservative parties in 1926." (Wiki)

36 quai d’orfevres surete generale paris


Serial Killers Wiki


Montmartre


La Sante Prison


Minister of Justice   Antony Ratier


Timeline 1924


fascists march into rome June 17

French Communism


Nationalism and Colonial Development


The Cleveland torso killer


Arrondissements of Paris


14th arrondissement (Montparnasse)


Andre Breton


Anarchism


"Illegalists usually did not seek moral basis for their actions, recognizing only the reality of 'might' rather than 'right'; for the most part, illegal acts were done simply to satisfy personal desires, not for some greater ideal,

Dadaist Manifresto



Bodies in fridges


Tuberculosis


Pension-style apartment



END













Friday, December 20, 2013

My First Hyper-text

The moors. (Veleta, Wiki.)








by Louis Shalako



A hypertext is a story with multiple endings or multiple story lines. It can also be a portal, one that takes the reader off on some long and involved journey. Hopefully it leads them somewhere new.

It seems to have done so for the author.

In its most complex form it can look like a tree, with all sorts of stand-alone spinoffs branching out in all directions.

The multiple ending version, in fiction, involves alternate storylines breaking off at a given point. Readers reach a certain point in the text and then they have a choice as to which alternative story line they wish to follow.

They don’t even have to read the book the same way twice—the next time they read it they might decide to see how another version of the book turned out. If there are three endings, there is three times the fun in reading it. If the book is a good one, with all sorts of subtexts and little curlicues of smoke going off in all directions, in all three versions, each of which is a unique story, if there are lots of thing implied but left unsaid, it might be beastly interesting as an overall art form. Your main characters change over the story—in three fascinating and different ways.

I’ve wanted to experiment with that for some time, ever since I first heard of it and understood what it was.

I’ve even wondered if I should put factual links in a mystery novel. I first thought of that while doing the research for Redemption: an Inspector Gilles Maintenon mystery. If readers could read about Gilles walking across the moors on his summer holiday, and then click on a link that takes them to good pictures and informative articles about the moors, it might help the story to come alive. It would help the reader to visualize the story. The whole thing is just denser in terms of reading material.

It might make the story a richer experience for the reader. Video and music links could be incorporated, and whenever the reader tired of that, they simply return to the story and carry on.

I haven’t brought myself to doing that yet, but writing even the simplest blog post with links out to any supporting material basically covers the whole process in a nutshell.

If you want a text with three endings, you simply write it. The beginning is common, and at the midpoint, there would be bookmarks to another piece of text inserted in the ebook after the ending of version one. 

That process is very simple.

All they have to do is click, and there they go. Next chapter, only it is version two.

There might be two links: all the reader has to do is to keep reading for version one, and there are version two and version three with their alternate endings.

It takes long enough to write a book, so I really haven’t gone after that idea.

However, non-fiction ebooks are a natural for some kind of conscious hyper-writing.

Once I have enough material, of news, views, opinions, commentary, a series of essays or whatever, I will definitely put that plan into operation.

I think that really does qualify as hypertext because it expands the story, non-fiction as it is, and over the course of time our hypothetical story ‘ending’ changes. That’s because an encyclopedic entity like Wikipedia, or any other repository of knowledge, updates and improves its database, so in that sense the story is ever-changing. That’s valid in the context of the modern world, where the pace of progress is so fast that some of what we write is out of date before it is even published.

It is also possible to put a brief note at the end of the book, linked to a website’s contact form, and readers would be able to report a broken link, offer opinions of their own, or interact to some degree with the author.

What’s really interesting is that readers can follow up a link, add their comments to the site or story, and advance the story on their own initiative, outside of the actual book. The book is a link or portal to offshoots beyond the control of the author. If someone has special knowledge or a unique perspective, then the work will go beyond the writer’s original vision and continue evolving over time. If you don’t agree with Wiki, you can sign up to edit the original material, give citations, and just advance the sum of human knowledge in general!

In a hyper-text, the links take the place of footnotes. In a hard copy book, the reader would have to option to search online or go to a physical library or bookstore in order to check out the references and source materials. Assuming the author ever decided to produce a non-fiction hardcover or paperback book, the hyper-links would become footnotes and reference notes in the back of the book.

It seems like a reasonable experiment, and it also involves new skills. Now the author must think in those hyper-textual terms: good links, good writing, good pictures, and from the perspective of the artist, it has to be coherent. It can’t be all ragged in places because you couldn’t find a good link.

It is a matter of the thing being well-conceived from start to finish, and that holds true whether it’s fiction or non-fiction.

Think of what all of this does to a writer’s mind.

It’s not exactly going to hurt my brain, is it, ladies and gentlemen?

Hell, it might even help.


END


Author's Note: Writing a hyper-text requires hyper-thinking, hyper-editing, and a kind of hyper-conception of the whole project from top to bottom. It is layered thinking rather than strictly linear.